Friday, March 28, 2008

China’s road to superpower status takes strange twists.

In an earlier blog, “China’s Position on the World Stage”, criteria given for superpower status included economic power and the ability to influence internationally appears to be accruing for China!

An article in the International Herald Tribune, “China law could impede Microsoft deal for Yahoo” illustrates China’s growing economic power and ability to project that power internationally. At issue is Microsoft's hostile-takeover attempt of Yahoo. Doing so may cause it to run up against a new Chinese anti-monopoly law that takes affect in August. In 2005 Yahoo had obtained a 40% interest in Altaba.com China’s largest e-commerce business. The law gives Chinese regulators the power to examine and act upon foreign mergers that involve companies invested in Chinese businesses.

China’s burgeoning economic powers is starting to give it regulatory influence that may eventually match those of Washington and the European Union in Brussels.

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Helping China’s young advance academically


As part of an assignment for the UNCG MALS Dragon Awakes course, we were to look at two different examples of China’s young. The first was an introduction to its culture in vibrant urban Shanghai, presented by FrontlineWorld reporter Nguyen Qui Duc with the help of Mian Mian who is “a poster child for spiritual pollution” according to government censors. The young came across as a frivolous group whose driving concern was fun and pleasure. The second example was with a young person named Alex who had more serious interests.

Alex is a serious young man whose thoughts went beyond the present. He was preparing himself for a good financial future to better himself, help his family and also his country. To that end he was majoring in Computer Science in college. Alex’s parents had lived through both China’s poorer times and the Cultural Revolution which likely meant that they were more concerned with obtaining the basics needed to exist. It was obvious that the parents wanted Alex to have better and helped him obtain it. No indication was given as to what was required of the parents to help Alex with his academic career. However, other examples that we have seen indicated that the parents often had to help both by encouragement and financially. Therefore any external financial help that could be obtained would be welcome to China’s young.

What may be an emerging approach to help China’s young advance academically, thereby helping both the person and the country, are scholarships provided by outside groups. One such scholarship has been announced by Peoples Daily Online as the “PD Online Scholarship.” The degree program to promote journalism and communication will be offered online at Peking University, Tsinghua University, Renmin University of China and the Communication University of China. Perhaps the concept will spread and will help more young people like Alex pursue their ambitions.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

China’s Position on the World Stage.

With China's current internal problems, should its world power status be reconsidered? Can China successfully overcome these difficulties to achieve such status on the world stage?

For many years the two world superpowers were the U.S. and the Soviet Union. More recently the Soviet Union had dissolved leaving and a number of newly independent states.” This left only the U.S. as the single superpower. In even more recent times China’s remarkable economic expansion on to the world stage has led to speculation as to whether it is heading to superpower status. On the other hand, China’s current internal problems add some pause to its readiness to reach that spire.

To judge China’s status, a definition of what is a superpower is needed. One by Lyman Miller1, which is generally accepted, says a superpower “is a country that has the capacity to project dominating power and influence anywhere in the world, and sometimes, in more than one region of the globe at a time, and so may plausibly attain the status of global hegemon.”1 Does China fulfill the requirements of the definition?

Miller’s article first examined what was the basis, in the past, which made certain countries superpowers. Included were economic, ability to influence internationally, projecting of military strength. China is becoming strong economically, but it is far from being a leader. The ability to influence internationally is primarily vested in its permanent seat on the UN Security Council. China’s increasing military strength is still tailored for regional operation with special emphasis on the Taiwan Strait. All-in-all Miller says that China’s emergence, though spectacular, only allows it to be considered as a strong regional power rather than as a superpower. Perhaps someday, but not today! Additionally, nowhere among the parameters was internal problems considered as a factor.

The March 15, 2008 issue of the Economist2 contains a special report titled “A Ravenous Dragon,” consisting of 8 interesting articles. It discusses China’s hunger for commodities to stoke their energy and industrial growth. Included among the commodities are oil, coal and metal ores including, among others, iron, aluminum, copper, zinc. Pertinent to this blog is the indication that China is setting up operations in a number of countries, including some with nasty governments, to aid them in their commodity procurement. This will enable China to increasingly be able to project its power internationally. The commodities that are coming back to China will primarily feed its growing heavy industry. The growth of heavy industry is adding to the huge environmental problems that China and its people are currently suffering. At the same time the growth of industry is adding to the turbulent social problem, especially the growing economic disparity between the urban and rural areas.

Can China’s current internal problems derail its present course to a stronger power status? Anything that could upset the political system within China, especially if it has characteristics that were as disruptive as the Cultural Revolution and Tiananmen Square Massacre, could slow down progress towards world power status. To calm its current internal problems, China will have to take some serious steps that will require the expenditure of a significant portion of its big economic growth. Indications are that China is starting to take its problems seriously. The question is will it be sufficient? What should also be considered is that the defining properties of world power status do not include internal or domestic problems; they are only of concern if they distract the country from its track to world status. In any event with China’s mounting presence on the world stage, being fed by the very powerful economic engine, it seems unlikely to be stopped!

  1. Lyman Miller, China an Emerging Superpower? Stanford Journal of International Relations, Winter 2005.
  2. Economist, (Go to website to locate March 15, 2008 issue, which contains Special Report consisting of 8 articles).

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Taiwan's quest for independence likely to wane after election

It appears that with the forthcoming March 22, 2008 presidential election that, no matter who wins, there will be a push for closer ties with mainland China. Thus Taiwan will shift in the opposite direction from which the outgoing president Chen Shui-bian has been moving. Chen had gone so far as to put a referendum on the ballot to determine if Taiwan should apply for membership in the United Nations under its own name rather than the Republic of China.


According to the International Herald-Tribune, the two candidates, Ma Ying-jeou and Frank Hsieh have campaigned on bringing Taiwan closer to China and away from separatism. They differ on the degree of closeness and to the timing. After the election it is expected that the Taiwanese government will move to defuse the tensions that have been raised by Chen.


Ma represents the Nationalist Party or Kuomintang, while Hsieh represents the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of outgoing President Chen. Ma is currently favored to win the election. Hsieh campaigned in the shadow of Chen, whose second term has been rocked by scandal. It is further expected that if Ma is elected rapport with China will likely move forward more rapidly.

Saturday, March 8, 2008

Are conditions ripe for levying environmental tax in China?

China is casting about for ways to decrease their environmental pollution. Jia Kang a member of the 11th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), the top advisory body of the country, announced that time is ripe for the country to levy a tax on pollution emissions, according to the Peoples Daily Online.


According to Jia, the tax should be “levied on discharge of pollutants including waste water, waste gas and solid waste, together with carbon dioxide emission.”


The first trick is to get an accurate assessment on the amount of pollutants discharged from a plant. Then determine the cost of controlling the discharge of the pollutants. Finally, set the tax level so that it is cheaper to install the proper technology than to continue to discharge and still pay the tax. In some cases the proper business decision might be to close down the plant rather than installing very expensive technology or paying very high taxes. Market forces will make the decision.


A pollution fee or tax mechanism is not used in the U.S. The closest thing to it would be fines levied by either EPA or the states, depending on the legislation that controls it.


The second trick is to define who monitors the discharge of pollutants. It could be the plant itself would be self-monitoring. See Cassie Tighe’s Blog #4 “China to Log its Worst Polluters.” It would be similar to asking a company to monitor itself on a voluntary basis, much like what our current Administration likes to do. Of course the results would be a joke. The job could also be given to the local authorities, which will also be a joke. The best approach would be to properly arm SEPA and give them the authority and personnel to monitor, enforce and levy the tax.