Tuesday, March 18, 2008

China’s Position on the World Stage.

With China's current internal problems, should its world power status be reconsidered? Can China successfully overcome these difficulties to achieve such status on the world stage?

For many years the two world superpowers were the U.S. and the Soviet Union. More recently the Soviet Union had dissolved leaving and a number of newly independent states.” This left only the U.S. as the single superpower. In even more recent times China’s remarkable economic expansion on to the world stage has led to speculation as to whether it is heading to superpower status. On the other hand, China’s current internal problems add some pause to its readiness to reach that spire.

To judge China’s status, a definition of what is a superpower is needed. One by Lyman Miller1, which is generally accepted, says a superpower “is a country that has the capacity to project dominating power and influence anywhere in the world, and sometimes, in more than one region of the globe at a time, and so may plausibly attain the status of global hegemon.”1 Does China fulfill the requirements of the definition?

Miller’s article first examined what was the basis, in the past, which made certain countries superpowers. Included were economic, ability to influence internationally, projecting of military strength. China is becoming strong economically, but it is far from being a leader. The ability to influence internationally is primarily vested in its permanent seat on the UN Security Council. China’s increasing military strength is still tailored for regional operation with special emphasis on the Taiwan Strait. All-in-all Miller says that China’s emergence, though spectacular, only allows it to be considered as a strong regional power rather than as a superpower. Perhaps someday, but not today! Additionally, nowhere among the parameters was internal problems considered as a factor.

The March 15, 2008 issue of the Economist2 contains a special report titled “A Ravenous Dragon,” consisting of 8 interesting articles. It discusses China’s hunger for commodities to stoke their energy and industrial growth. Included among the commodities are oil, coal and metal ores including, among others, iron, aluminum, copper, zinc. Pertinent to this blog is the indication that China is setting up operations in a number of countries, including some with nasty governments, to aid them in their commodity procurement. This will enable China to increasingly be able to project its power internationally. The commodities that are coming back to China will primarily feed its growing heavy industry. The growth of heavy industry is adding to the huge environmental problems that China and its people are currently suffering. At the same time the growth of industry is adding to the turbulent social problem, especially the growing economic disparity between the urban and rural areas.

Can China’s current internal problems derail its present course to a stronger power status? Anything that could upset the political system within China, especially if it has characteristics that were as disruptive as the Cultural Revolution and Tiananmen Square Massacre, could slow down progress towards world power status. To calm its current internal problems, China will have to take some serious steps that will require the expenditure of a significant portion of its big economic growth. Indications are that China is starting to take its problems seriously. The question is will it be sufficient? What should also be considered is that the defining properties of world power status do not include internal or domestic problems; they are only of concern if they distract the country from its track to world status. In any event with China’s mounting presence on the world stage, being fed by the very powerful economic engine, it seems unlikely to be stopped!

  1. Lyman Miller, China an Emerging Superpower? Stanford Journal of International Relations, Winter 2005.
  2. Economist, (Go to website to locate March 15, 2008 issue, which contains Special Report consisting of 8 articles).

7 comments:

Angie S. said...

Norm
There seems to be two faces to China: internal and external. Internal seems extremely fragile. Externally it is a powerful force that must be handled with care. Both faces are reliant on the other which has the makings of a great success story or a huge tragedy!

Angie

Amanda said...

Norm-
Your post made me consider two things. First, as China is intertwining itself in countries with very problematic governments, will they eventually use their influence in these countries for good or bad against the US? Secondly, as Angie already stated and our readings have shown us, the internal problems of China could destroy their whole country. China appears so strong, yet so weak on the inside. If their internal problems are pronounced, what will happen to the US?!! (you don't need to answer these questions..thanks for making me think about these subjects!)

Susan Rooks said...

We need to consider China's status very seriously. To me, China is like a sixteen year old kid with a new driver's license. He may know how to drive, but he doesn't have the maturity to be responsible. As long as the economy rules, China will be allowed to get away with murder (or at least vehicular homocide, to continue the metaphor).

Susan

Steve Adams said...

Norman, I found your clarification useful about what would or would not constitute a super power. It is also interesting that internal conditions do not count in this consideration. Yet as others have noted, it is the internal that will tell the tale. Angie's "two faces" are two faces to watch, and I like Susan's teenage driver metaphor. I was also interested in your remarks about metals. China is rich in metal ore resources, so if they need to import heavily, it says something about their use of them.

Ellen O. said...

Norm- as Steve noted the definition of a superpower is particularly helpful in thinking about China's status. I can understand to some degree why internal issues would not be included. The three characteristics of a superpower(economics,military strength and int'l influence)can be measured by raw data, but how can you measure the scope of internal problems and the impact they bear on a country's growth? That would seem to be largely determined by a country's response.I think,as you suggest in your post,internal problems will be the deal maker or breaker.

Gina said...

Norm,
Two comments. First, you say that with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the U.S. remained the sole superpower. That's true. However, the curent administration has severely damaged U.S. influence and prestige around the world, so I think our superpower star has dimmed, although not died. On the other hand, under Putin (Russia's economic turnaround and Putin's confrontational comments), Russia has regained much of its former superpower luster. Is China far behind? I think China definitely is a world power, although I agree with you that it has not attained "super" status - yet.

cassie t said...

I think that if China considers itself a superpower...than we ought to, as well. After all...in today's day and age...its all about who you know.